Abstract
In recent years there has been an increasing emphasis on including humans when modelling socio-environmental systems. However, it is crucial that we remain mindful of the impacts that the decisions made during model development or analysis can have on people or nature as modelling is not an impartial process. Responsible modelling requires us to consider the broader societal implications of our work, therefore, modellers should consider a range of ethical concerns, often found beyond those prescribed through institutionally mandated ethical approval processes. Herein we examine the ethical dimensions of six socio-environmental case studies using the principles of credibility, legitimacy, and salience, encompassing the modelling process from conception to delivery and beyond. We also discuss the results from an interdisciplinary workshop held with experienced modellers to co-produce a list of ethical dimensions that modellers would ideally engage with when conducting a modelling project. Based on our findings, we have developed a set of recommendations to: i) support modellers in ensuring their modelling practice is underpinned by ethical reflection, ii) guide end-users of model outputs when selecting and repurposing those outputs, and iii) identify means by which institutions can support responsible modelling practices. Engaging with ethical dimensions in the process of modelling is critical for building trust with stakeholders, therefore enhancing the credibility, legitimacy, and salience of the models and research.
References
Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., von Wehrden, H., Abernethy, P., Ives, C. D., Jager, N. W., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y
Amorocho-Daza, H., van der Zaag, P., & Sušnik, J. (2023). Ethical considerations of using system dynamics in participatory settings: A social-ecological-systems perspective. System Dynamics Review, 40, e1755. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1755
Beck, J. M., Elliott, K. C., Booher, C. R., Renn, K. A., & Montgomery, R. A. (2021). The application of reflexivity for conservation science. Biological Conservation, 262, 109322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109322
Beck, S., & Mahony, M. (2017). The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. Nature Climate Change, 7(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3264
Bennett, M. M., Chen, J. K., Alvarez León, L. F., & Gleason, C. J. (2022). The politics of pixels: A review and agenda for critical remote sensing. Progress in Human Geography, 46(3), 729–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325221074691
Beven, K. (2006). A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology, 320(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007
Box, G. E. P. (1976). Science and Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71(356), 791–799. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949
Buck, H. J. (2016). Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: Social barriers and social implications. Climatic Change, 139(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1770-6
Caniglia, G., Freeth, R., Luederitz, C., Leventon, J., West, S. P., John, B., Peukert, D., Lang, D. J., von Wehrden, H., Martín-López, B., Fazey, I., Russo, F., von Wirth, T., Schlüter, M., & Vogel, C. (2023). Practical wisdom and virtue ethics for knowledge co-production in sustainability science. Nature Sustainability, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01040-1
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J. D., Anderson, J., & Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043
Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jäger, J., & Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dunn, G., & Laing, M. (2017). Policy-makers perspectives on credibility, relevance and legitimacy (CRELE). Environmental Science & Policy, 76, 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.005
Gebru, T., Morgenstern, J., Vecchione, B., Vaughan, J. W., Wallach, H., III, H. D., & Crawford, K. (2021). Datasheets for datasets. Communications of the ACM, 64(12), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1145/3458723
Gould, E., Fraser, H. S., Parker, T. H., Nakagawa, S., Griffith, S. C., Vesk, P. A., Fidler, F., Hamilton, D. G., Abbey-Lee, R. N., Abbott, J. K., Aguirre, L. A., Alcaraz, C., Aloni, I., Altschul, D., Arekar, K., Atkins, J. W., Atkinson, J., Baker, C., Barrett, M., … Zitomer, R. A. (2025). Same data, different analysts: Variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology. BMC Biology, 23(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-02101-x
Hamilton, S. H., Fu, B., Guillaume, J. H. A., Badham, J., Elsawah, S., Gober, P., Hunt, R. J., Iwanaga, T., Jakeman, A. J., Ames, D. P., Curtis, A., Hill, M. C., Pierce, S. A., & Zare, F. (2019). A framework for characterising and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 118, 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.04.008
Hird, C., David-Chavez, D. M., Gion, S. S., & van Uitregt, V. (2023). Moving beyond ontological (worldview) supremacy: Indigenous insights and a recovery guide for settler-colonial scientists. Journal of Experimental Biology, 226(12), jeb245302. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.245302
Holländer, H. M., Bormann, H., Blume, T., Buytaert, W., Chirico, G. B., Exbrayat, J.-F., Gustafsson, D., Hölzel, H., Krauße, T., Kraft, P., Stoll, S., Blöschl, G., & Flühler, H. (2014). Impact of modellers’ decisions on hydrological a priori predictions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(6), 2065–2085. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-2065-2014
Iturbide, M., Fernández, J., Gutiérrez, J. M., Pirani, A., Huard, D., Al Khourdajie, A., Baño-Medina, J., Bedia, J., Casanueva, A., Cimadevilla, E., Cofiño, A. S., De Felice, M., Diez-Sierra, J., García-Díez, M., Goldie, J., Herrera, D. A., Herrera, S., Manzanas, R., Milovac, J., Radhakrishnan, A., San-Martín, D., Spinuso, A., Thyng, K.M., Trenham, C., Yelekçi, Ö. (2022). Implementation of FAIR principles in the IPCC: The WGI AR6 Atlas repository. Scientific Data, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01739-y
Jones, N., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03802-160146
Klein, A., Unverzagt, K., Alba, R., Donges, J. F., Hertz, T., Krueger, T., Lindkvist, E., Martin, R., Niewöhner, J., Prawitz, H., Schlüter, M., Schwarz, L., & Wijermans, N. (2024). From situated knowledges to situated modelling: A relational framework for simulation modelling. Ecosystems and People, 20(1), 2361706. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2024.2361706
Koomey, J. (2013). Moving beyond benefit–cost analysis of climate change. Environmental Research Letters, 8(4), 041005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/041005
Kunseler, E.-M., Tuinstra, W., Vasileiadou, E., & Petersen, A. C. (2015). The reflective futures practitioner: Balancing salience, credibility and legitimacy in generating foresight knowledge with stakeholders. Futures, 66, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.006
Lenzi, D., Lamb, W. F., Hilaire, J., Kowarsch, M., & Minx, J. C. (2018). Don’t deploy negative emissions technologies without ethical analysis. Nature, 561(7723), 303–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06695-5
Levy, M. A., Lubell, M. N., & McRoberts, N. (2018). The structure of mental models of sustainable agriculture. Nature Sustainability, 1(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0116-y
MacFarlane, A., & O’Reilly-de Brún, M. (2012). Using a Theory-Driven Conceptual Framework in Qualitative Health Research. Qualitative Health Research, 22(5), 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311431898
Matthias, A. (2004). The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(3), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-004-3422-1
Mazzega, P. (2018). On the Ethics of Biodiversity Models, Forecasts and Scenarios. Asian Bioethics Review, 10(4), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41649-018-0069-5
McLaren, D. P. (2018). Whose climate and whose ethics? Conceptions of justice in solar geoengineering modelling. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.021
Meadows, D. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. The Sustainability Institute, December, 19.
Mercer, H., & Simpson, T. (2023). Imperialism, colonialism, and climate change science. WIREs Climate Change, 14(6), e851 . https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.851
Miro. (2023). Miro Online Whiteboard (Version no version provided) [Computer software]. RealTimeBoard, Inc. www.miro.com
Mochizuki, J., & Wada, Y. (2023). Closing the loop of reflexivity. Nature Climate Change, 13, 110–112. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01569-1
Ormerod, R. J., & Ulrich, W. (2013). Operational research and ethics: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 228(2), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.048
Ottinger, G. (2023). Responsible epistemic innovation: How combatting epistemic injustice advances responsible innovation (and vice versa). Journal of Responsible Innovation, 10(1), 2054306. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2054306
Petrozzino, C. (2021). Who pays for ethical debt in AI? AI and Ethics, 1(3), 205–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00030-3
Picavet, E. (2009). Opportunities and pitfalls for ethical analysis in operations research and the management sciences. Omega, 37(6), 1121–1131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2008.12.002
Puy, A., & Saltelli, A. (2023). Mind the hubris: Complexity can misfire. In The Politics of Modelling: Numbers Between Science and Policy (pp. 51–68). Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cbmlcsiro/detail.action?docID=7280449
Richards, D., Worden, D., Song, X. P., & Lavorel, S. (2024). Harnessing generative artificial intelligence to support nature-based solutions. People and Nature, 6, 882–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10622
Robinson, C. J., Urzedo, D., Macdonald, J. M., Ligtermoet, E., Penton, C. E., Lourie, H., & Hoskins, A. (2023). Place-based data justice practices for collaborative conservation research: A critical review. Biological Conservation, 288, 110346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110346
Ruano-Chamorro, C., Gurney, G. G., & Cinner, J. E. (2022). Advancing procedural justice in conservation. Conservation Letters, 15(3), e12861. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12861
Russell, J. Y. (2010). A Philosophical Framework for an Open and Critical Transdisciplinary Inquiry. In J. Harris, V. A. Brown, & J. Y. Russell (Eds.) Tackling Wicked Problems: Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination (1st ed., pp. 31–60). Routledge.
Saltelli, A., Bammer, G., Bruno, I., Charters, E., Di Fiore, M., Didier, E., Nelson Espeland, W., Kay, J., Lo Piano, S., Mayo, D., Pielke Jr, R., Portaluri, T., Porter, T. M., Puy, A., Rafols, I., Ravetz, J. R., Reinert, E., Sarewitz, D., Stark, P. B., … Vineis, P. (2020). Five ways to ensure that models serve society: A manifesto. Nature, 582(7813), 482–484. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01812-9
Saltelli, A., & Di Fiore, M. (2023). The Politics of Modelling: Numbers Between Science and Policy. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/cbmlcsiro/detail.action?docID=7280449
Shirk, J., Ballard, H., Wilderman, C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstein, B., Krasny, M., & Bonney, R. (2012). Public Participation in Scientific Research: A Framework for Deliberate Design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229
Shuster, E. (1997). Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(20), 1436–1440. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199711133372006
Srinivasan, R., & Chander, A. (2021). Biases in AI Systems. Communications of the ACM, 64(8), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1145/3464903
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
Tschakert, P. (2022). More-than-human solidarity and multispecies justice in the climate crisis. Environmental Politics, 31(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1853448
Tschakert, P., Barnett, J., Ellis, N., Lawrence, C., Tuana, N., New, M., Elrick-Barr, C., Pandit, R., & Pannell, D. (2017). Climate change and loss, as if people mattered: Values, places, and experiences. WIREs Climate Change, 8(5), e476. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.476
Urzedo, D., & Robinson, C. J. (2023). Decolonizing ecosystem valuation to sustain Indigenous worldviews. Environmental Science & Policy, 150, 103580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103580
Valkenburg, G., Mamidipudi, A., Pandey, P., & Bijker, W. E. (2020). Responsible innovation as empowering ways of knowing. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(1), 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1647087
van den Broek, K. L., Luomba, J., van den Broek, J., & Fischer, H. (2023). Content and complexity of stakeholders’ mental models of socio-ecological systems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 85, 101906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101906
van Kerkhoff, L., & Pilbeam, V. (2017). Understanding socio-cultural dimensions of environmental decision-making: A knowledge governance approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.011
van Voorn, G. A. K., Verburg, R. W., Kunseler, E.-M., Vader, J., & Janssen, P. H. M. (2016). A checklist for model credibility, salience, and legitimacy to improve information transfer in environmental policy assessments. Environmental Modelling & Software, 83, 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.06.003
Wagner, N., Sarkki, S., & Dietz, T. (2024). More than policy neutral: Justifying the power of science-policy interfaces through legitimacy. Earth System Governance, 21, 100219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2024.100219
Weir, J. K., Morgain, R., Moon, K., & Moggridge, B. J. (2024). Centring Indigenous peoples in knowledge exchange research-practice by resetting assumptions, relationships and institutions. Sustainability Science, 19, 629-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01457-3
Wendelborn, C., Anger, M., & Schickhardt, C. (2023). What is data stewardship? Towards a comprehensive understanding. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 140, 104337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104337
West, S., Haider, L. J., Stålhammar, S., & Woroniecki, S. (2020). A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosystems and People, 16(1), 304–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417
Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
Zimm, C., Mintz-Woo, K., Brutschin, E., Hanger-Kopp, S., Hoffmann, R., Kikstra, J. S., Kuhn, M., Min, J., Muttarak, R., Pachauri, S., Patange, O., Riahi, K., & Schinko, T. (2024). Justice considerations in climate research. Nature Climate Change, 14, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01869-0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Katrina Szetey, Delphi Ward, Sabrina Chakori, David Douglas, Elizabeth Fulton, Nicola Grigg, Emma Ligtermoet, Claudia Munera-Roldan, Esther Onyango, Erinne Stirling, Roshni Subramaniam